In a post published on October 19, 2026, Meta states that the first phase of Prometheus, its gigawatt-scale supercluster in New Albany, Ohio, is complete, that the completed phase was used to train the Muse foundational models including Muse Wonder, and that Meta is working toward scaling Prometheus to comprise approximately 1 million GPUs, having achieved more than 85% goodput for pre-training runs and more than 90% goodput for reinforcement learning runs of Muse Wonder.

● OPEN · settles 2026-10-23

Background

Meta says the first phase of Prometheus, its gigawatt-scale supercluster in New Albany, Ohio, is complete and was used to train the Muse foundational models, including Muse Wonder. The cluster already links hundreds of thousands of GPUs across several buildings and is being scaled toward roughly one million GPUs. Meta reports more than 85% goodput on Muse Wonder pre-training runs and more than 90% on reinforcement-learning runs, with mean time between interruptions now above 54,000 GPU hours after firmware fixes.

This market exists because launch announcements are easy to make and hard to grade. Press releases describe what a company intends to ship; they rarely come back later to say whether it shipped. AI Rank Bank pulls one checkable sentence out of the coverage — the sentence above — gives it a date, and lets readers price it in public. The launch itself stays with its publisher; what lives here is the claim, the crowd's call, and eventually the receipt.

How this claim is judged

Judging criteria, fixed when the market opened: Delivered if, at the check time, Meta's engineering post remains published stating that Prometheus's first phase is complete and was used to train the Muse foundational models including Muse Wonder, that Meta is working toward approximately 1 million GPUs, and reporting goodput above 85% for pre-training and above 90% for reinforcement learning.

The source of record is the publisher's own page linked above. A claim about a company's product is judged against that company's public output — its product pages, documentation, changelogs and official posts — not against rumors or third-party summaries. Only yes-or-no outcomes count: partial credit is not a verdict, and a claim that needs a paragraph of excuses has already answered itself.

How readers called it

2 readers called this claim. 0% said it would deliver.

0 Will deliver · 2 Won't ship

Points reward being right against the crowd. A correct call pays 100 × (1 − the share of readers who agreed with you when you placed it), with a floor of 10: side with a 90% consensus and a win pays 10, stand alone and a win pays up to 100. Wrong calls pay nothing. The price is locked in when the call is placed, so early readers are paid for judging before the crowd forms, not for copying it.

How readers split

Share of readers saying “will deliver”: opened at 0%, now at 0%. 4 snapshots on record since 2026-10-20 — a snapshot lands whenever a call is placed, and at least hourly while the market is open.

Verdict

No verdict yet. This claim is checked on 2026-10-23 08:00 Eastern Time (12:00 UTC) against the source of record below. When the check happens, one of three stamps lands on this page permanently: delivered if the claim came true as stated, busted if it did not, or unproven if the date passes without public evidence either way. Unproven claims pay no points and do not count against any reader's hit rate.

About this market

AI Rank Bank is an AI news front page with a memory. Every launch on the homepage carries one claim like this one, with a check date. Readers call claims with points, build a public record, and climb the leaderboard. Companies build a record too: every settled claim lands on the company's bank page, where its delivery rate is simple arithmetic that nobody gets to edit afterwards. There is no money in the market — points buy bragging rights only, which keeps the incentives pointed at being right.